Signals are clues.
Use wearable trends alongside context and self-report. Treat an inferred state as uncertain, and ask when needed.
BLISS VIBE · ADAPTIVE PERSONAL INTELLIGENCE
We are developing the intelligence behind BLISS: connecting wearable signals, personal context and memory to learn when help is welcome, and when space matters more.
In development · Product vision and research approach
Remind gently
A possible invitation after a busy moment. Ask first, and let your response shape what happens next.
Interactive concept · Illustrative decisions, not live sensing.
01 / THE QUESTION
A change in heart rate does not tell us how someone feels. A free calendar does not mean they want company. The challenge is deciding whether an intervention is welcome, not simply possible.
Use wearable trends alongside context and self-report. Treat an inferred state as uncertain, and ask when needed.
Design memory around preferences people can review and change. A past choice is context, not a permanent rule.
Weigh likely benefit, confidence, interruption cost and permission before choosing to act, ask or stay quiet.
02 / ONE MOMENT, DIFFERENT CHOICES
Follow one illustrative afternoon. The signal alone does not decide the response. Context, preferences and your correction change the choice.
Concept demonstration. The times, signals and preferences are fictional. No personal data is collected by this demo; it does not run a sensing or learning model.
03 / THE LEARNING LOOP
Our proposed architecture connects sensing to feedback. The research goal is to improve the choice of whether, when and how to help for each person over time.
Device signals, permitted context and what you choose to share.
Possible states, their confidence and the information still missing.
Balance expected benefit against interruption cost and your boundaries.
Act within permission, ask gently, defer or remain quiet.
Use explicit corrections to revise preferences and future choices.
Design requirements: inspectable memory, editable preferences, revocable permissions and a clear explanation of why the system intervened. Silence alone should not be treated as consent or positive feedback.
04 / WHAT NEEDS TO BE PROVEN
The validation we propose: compare adaptive timing with fixed schedules and simple rules, then measure both usefulness and the cost of getting it wrong.
| Question | Evidence to collect |
|---|---|
| Less unwanted interruption? | Unwanted prompts per day, dismissals and user-reported burden. |
| More useful support? | Accepted suggestions, task completion and the person’s own assessment of benefit. |
| Learning from correction? | Repeated unwanted prompts after feedback, compared with the rule-based baseline. |
| Too quiet at the wrong time? | Missed wanted support, incorrect state estimates and failures to respect permission. |
Evaluation plan, not published results. This page presents a concept and proposed approach; it does not establish clinical benefit or validated state-recognition accuracy.
05 / ONE INTELLIGENCE, MANY FORMS
BLISS is the ecosystem. One and Privé are its wearable expressions. Vibe is the personal intelligence we are developing to connect signals, context and the response.
Smart rings at the center of everyday wellness, with the Pulse health band and Nourish nutrition necklace in development. A route toward bringing movement, rest and meals into one picture.
Explore Bliss One →Design-led rings and personal wearable concepts. The ambition is for intelligence to fit the pieces you want to wear, with capabilities defined for each product.
Discover Privé →THE NEXT CONVERSATION
We welcome conversations with researchers, product builders and partners about personal memory, intervention timing and how to validate this approach in everyday life.
support@blissing.app ↗